![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

65°
Partly Cloudy | 12MPH
NEWSROOM * CIRCULATION * ADVERTISING
Friday
September 2010
3
Where do I begin? It sure sounds to me like the government isn't really thinking through this "stimulus" package. And I don't mean just the Democrats. I heard a comment by one of the politicians (I believe it was a Republican) sometime over the last several days that the American public wants them to cross aisles and work together so they need to get this done. What??!! I thought the idea was to help stimulate the economy and not show how the two parties can work together. It sounds to me like someone has their priorities wrong. Don't get me wrong, something needs to be done to help get the economy going. But does "new uniforms for TSA" or "polar icebreakers" get it done? I don't think so! How about building "nature trails"? Nope. Providing help to states for unemployment insurance? Nope. High speed internet access to rural and underserved areas? Don't think so.
I recently heard an idea by a good friend of mine suggest the government give every tax payer like $100,000. Let them spend it the way they want. I ran the idea past a number of other friends and co-workers and it was very well-received unlike the government ideas. One co-worker said he'd take a couple of vacations that he hadn't taken in years (stimulate the travel industry). Another said they'd buy a car (stimulate the auto industry). Another one said they'd pay off their credit cards (stimulate the banking industry). Think of all the other things that it could do....sure, some people would save the money, but others might pay for college or invest in the stock market or purchase real estate. Almost every last one of these ideas helps the economy. And all without government oversight (who's going to oversee the government programs?). The only oversight needed is to make sure all the taxpayers get their money.
Why does the government always have to make things so difficult? Many times the easiest solution is the best.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
|
|||||||||||
3 Comments
Pam Rosen - Feb 09, 2009 4:16 PM
Here's the link to the pdf form of the bill being debated in the
Senate. Check out all the "goodies" buried inside for yourself.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1eh.txt.pdf
Also check out this article on Bloomberg.com. Very disheartening!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs
yankee6161 - Feb 17, 2009 6:37 PM
I'm not sure what's so difficult to understand about this. Virtually all government spending serves is an economic stimulu. It's all demand!!!
Furthermore, your suggestion of giving all tax payers $100,000 would NOT solve our economic problem. We do not have a lack of money in our economy (goodness, the federal funds rate is at 0% meaning banks can borrow money at almost no cost; personal savings rates have been increasing in recent months for the first time in more than a generation meaning people have been socking away money and not spending it; demand for government bonds is at an all time high). Those who have their jobs are not spending their money as they have in recent years. Giving people more money (tax breaks, "stimulus" checks) will not mean a 1 for 1 increase in consumer demand (aka spending). Do taxpayers wish to fork out, say, $500B in stimulus checks to find out that only $200B was actually spent leading to job creation, etc?
Finally, your idea of giving every tax payer $100K would really bankrupt this country. Some math: $100,000 x 100,000,000 (estimated number of American tax payers) = 10,000,000,000,000 (10 Trillion) If you take the current stimulus bill (about $800B) and spread it out amonst the 100M US taxpayers, each would get about $8,000. A nice sum, but not quite the 100K you proposed.
GTT - Mar 04, 2009 3:20 PM