cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner
JSOnline today carries an article by Tom Kertscher that begins, at least, to answer some questions that have been swirling in my mind for several weeks. Rumors have been 'on the streets' since early-September to the effect that there had been turmoil within Village Hall. This article points to a memorandum, written by Village Administrator Dave Schornack, that points to allegations by a village employee concerning sexual harassment supposedly involving Village President Tom Kempinski.
It seems there was sufficient impact in the allegations to warrant a special meeting of the Village Board on September 22nd, although that is supposition based on timing and the purpose declared for the 'closed meeting' being matters involving personnel.
The memo apparently indicates that the employee alleges her being tasked with personal work for Mr. Kempinski that included helping him apply for jobs. All this supposedly happened on village time using village assets.
Forget, for the moment, that there were also supposedly sexual harassment elements included in the complaints made by the employee. The simple accusation of the use of village employees for personal services on village time is sufficiently serious so as to warrant an open investigation.
There have been other suggestions of personal and/or non-village activities performed by staff on behalf of Mr. Kempinski. One of these allegations centered on the Leadership Germantown project of Kempinski's that saw the Farmer's Market moved to The Livery in Rockfield. That supposedly consumed some village employee time and materials. The metal signage created to point people to The Livery was supposedly made by village employees using village equipment.
Individual allegations can usually be dismissed but the appearance of more than one or two such instances begs a public review.
Among the questions that arise is this: If there was sufficient apparent substance to warrant the memo from Mr. Schornack, and he apparently felt that to be the case, and if there are other supposed situations where village resources were deployed on behalf of an individual, what else is there to be found in a detailed public audit?
If, as I suspect, some seek the resignation of Mr. Kempinski, the audit should be made anyway. Citizens have a right to know about these allegations in light of this article and the disclosure of the memorandum that prompted it.